Case study 06 · Manufacturing

Building capability by changing the work

At the UK production site of a global payment technology manufacturer, we led and facilitated a series of five-day Kaizen events. Each one brought operators, team leaders, engineers and support staff together, trained them in Lean principles and the eight wastes, then had them change their own workplace that same week. The results showed up in the KPIs: more output per person, shorter cycle times, stronger maintenance and fewer defects.

Download the PDF Talk to us about Kaizen
Client
UK production site, global payment technology manufacturer
Sector
Manufacturing, electromechanical assembly
Services
Kaizen facilitation, Lean training, TPM, structured problem-solving
Engagement
Kaizen programme, 2019 to 2021, five events featured
At a glance
+44% units per person per hour on a hopper line
176s → 130s cycle time on a multi-variant line
22% → 97% TPM score on a validator cell
100+ people trained across all our Kaizen events at the site
Context

The challenge

The site builds coin-handling and payment equipment across many product lines, and one line alone had 308 variants. Demand was rising on some lines: one sub-assembly line had to go from 1,400 to 1,750 units a week to support a product ramp-up. Others had too many configurations to plan reliably, no formal maintenance routine, or recurring quality problems.

Each problem needed more than a quick fix. The people running the line had to understand why it was happening and own the new way of working, so the improvement would last after the week was over.

Also at this site

Alongside the Kaizen programme, we led the transfer of a multimillion-pound production facility from Germany to the UK: travelling to the German site, replicating the product lines, training operatives and setting productivity baselines. The same Kaizen methods then took efficiency beyond the original operation.

Our approach

Training through doing

A Kaizen week: day one see the work, day two find the waste, day three choose the fixes, day four change the workplace, day five prove and report

Train by doing

Every event ran over five days with a mixed team of five to nine people: operators, team leaders, quality, engineering, maintenance, HSE, supply chain and finance, some on their first Kaizen. Short training blocks each morning were put straight to work on the line.

Proven methods in practice

Teams set the pace with takt time, balanced the work to it with load charts and standard work, and built playbooks for different crew sizes. Two-bin point-of-use systems, kitting and a dedicated material handler pulled parts to the line. Mistake-proofing, 5S and visual management (andon lights, shadow boards, floor markings and performance boards) made the new standard easy to follow and easy to check.

Seeing the eight wastes

Teams learned the eight wastes, then audited their own lines to find them. Seeing waste in their own work, rather than in a classroom example, is what made the changes stick.

Five principles behind the changes

Value Start from what the customer needs: the right product, right first time.
Value stream Map every step of the process as it really runs, not as it is written.
Flow Takt time, balanced work and a set amount of work in progress.
Pull Two-bin point-of-use, kitting and a material handler bring parts to the line.
Perfection Standard work, visual management and owned actions keep improvement going.
The eight wastes as the teams found them: transport, inventory, motion, waiting, over-production, over-processing, defects and unused skills
In the workplace

Changing the workplace, that week

The rule was simple: if the team could change it during the week, they did. Ideas were tried on the line, re-timed to prove they worked, written into standard work and trained out to operators before the report-out.

  • Cells re-laid out so operators could reach every test rig without leaving their seat
  • Jigs fixed to benches, and broken jigs replaced with new 3D-printed ones
  • Two-bin point-of-use racks with return chutes and labelled locations, plus kitting trolleys for the next order
  • Hand drivers replaced with torque-set electric drivers, and screw counters with go/no-go lights
  • A single-coin jig to mistake-proof test insertion
  • A digital maintenance hub with daily and weekly checks, red and green gauge zones, and critical spares at the cell

Each week ended with a report-out to leadership and a newspaper of open actions with owners and dates, so nothing was left hanging.

Safety first, every time

Every event started with safety. Equipment was locked out before anyone worked on it, and safety issues were fixed during the week rather than added to a list. Replacing hand drivers with torque-set electric drivers also reduced the risk of repetitive strain.

8 of 8 safety issues fixed during the week on the hopper line
8 of 8 safety red tags closed in the maintenance event
2 → 0 medium risks on the validator cell, all reduced to low
Results

What changed, event by event

Before and after: units per person per hour 9 to 13 and 20.4 to 27.6; cycle time 300 to 252 seconds and 176 to 130 seconds; TPM score 22% to 97%; 5S score 47% to 98%
Standard work for flow

Hopper sub-assembly line

Output up from 1,400 to 1,750 a week on a single day shift. Units per person per hour up 44%, from 9 to 13, and cycle time down 16%, from 300 to 252 seconds. Eight safety issues fixed and the 5S audit score up from 15 to 24.

Standard work for flow

Multi-variant assembly line

Cycle time down from 176 to 130 seconds and units per person per hour up from 20.4 to 27.6. Kitting removed around three minutes of part-chasing per order, and 8 m² of floor space was freed across three cells.

Total productive maintenance

Validator cell

TPM score up from 22% to 97% and 5S from 47% to 98%. 64 issues red-tagged and 60 closed in the week, including every safety item, with daily, weekly, preventive and predictive checks now in place.

Structured problem-solving

Validator test failures

Showed that 80% of test failures were genuine and 20% process-related, then mistake-proofed coin insertion. 10 of 11 actions were completed in the week, targeting first pass yield up from 89% to 94%.

Structured problem-solving

Missing and loose screws

Screw counters with go/no-go lights, torque-set electric drivers in place of hand drivers (reducing strain risk) and 38% fewer driver types on the problem stages, targeting an 80% reduction in missing and loose screws.

Client and product details have been anonymised. Results are drawn from the Kaizen events’ own report-outs; targets are labelled as such.

Lessons

What the teams would tell the next one

01

Challenge the current set-up

Don’t accept that a layout can’t change, even on a largely automated line.

02

Operators make the difference

Input from the people on the line had the biggest impact. Fresh eyes brought new ideas.

03

Go and see

Find the problem where it happens, and listen to the people who do the work.

04

Prepare to act

Validate targets and prove concepts before the week, so equipment can be ordered in time.

Start a conversation

Want your teams improving their own work?

We run Kaizen events and Lean training that build lasting improvement capability on the shop floor. Let’s talk about where your operation could start.

Book a discovery call Download this case study